Introduction

Knowledge‑base platforms are software services that store, organise, and retrieve information for individuals or teams. They range from lightweight personal note‑taking tools to enterprise‑grade wikis that support complex permission structures, version control, and extensive integrations. The products reviewed here serve both personal productivity and corporate knowledge‑management use cases, allowing users to capture documentation, standard operating procedures, FAQs, and other reference material in a searchable, collaborative environment.

Below is a brief overview of six widely‑used platforms, each followed by a concise summary, a list of advantages and disadvantages, and a link to the vendor’s website.

Notion

Notion combines note‑taking, databases, and task management in a unified workspace. It is popular among freelancers, small teams, and larger organisations that value a flexible, page‑based interface. The platform supports rich media embedding, relational databases, and a growing ecosystem of third‑party widgets, making it suitable for both personal knowledge repositories and departmental wikis.

Visit Notion

Pros

The interface is highly visual, allowing users to design pages without code. Free tier includes unlimited pages and a generous block limit, which is sufficient for personal use. Real‑time collaboration works smoothly across browsers and mobile apps.

Cons

Advanced permission granularity is limited compared to dedicated enterprise wikis. Performance can degrade with very large databases, and the pricing model for premium features may become costly for growing teams.

Confluence

Confluence is Atlassian’s flagship team collaboration product, designed for corporate environments that require structured documentation and tight integration with development tools. It provides hierarchical page organization, robust access controls, and native support for macros, making it suitable for technical documentation, product manuals, and internal knowledge bases.

Visit Confluence

Pros

Deep integration with Jira and other Atlassian products streamlines workflow for software teams. Permissions can be set at space, page, or individual level, offering fine‑grained security. Enterprise‑grade scalability and audit logging meet compliance requirements.

Cons

User interface is less intuitive for casual users, leading to a steeper learning curve. The pricing structure is per‑user and can be expensive for large organisations. Customisation beyond built‑in macros often requires additional plugins.

Slab

Slab positions itself as a knowledge‑base focused on simplicity and powerful search. It offers a clean, markdown‑based editor, automatic linking, and a built‑in analytics dashboard that shows content usage. The platform is marketed toward teams that need a lightweight yet searchable repository without the overhead of full‑blown wikis.

Visit Slab

Pros

Search relevance is strong, leveraging AI‑assisted suggestions. The minimalist design reduces clutter, making onboarding quick for new users. Integration with Slack, GitHub, and Google Workspace keeps content in sync with existing tools.

Cons

Limited page‑level customization options; users cannot embed complex interactive elements easily. The free tier caps the number of active users and limits export capabilities. Advanced reporting features are only available on higher‑priced plans.

Guru

Guru is a knowledge‑management solution that emphasizes real‑time verification and card‑based content delivery. It is often used as a “single source of truth” for sales, support, and customer‑facing teams, delivering information directly within the applications where it is needed (e.g., Chrome extension, Salesforce).

Visit Guru

Pros

Verification workflow prompts owners to review and update content on a schedule, keeping information fresh. Contextual delivery reduces the need to switch applications. API access enables custom integrations with CRM and ticketing systems.

Cons

The card‑centric model can feel restrictive for extensive documentation that benefits from hierarchical structuring. Pricing is per active user, which can increase costs for large support teams. Export options are limited in lower tiers.

Helpjuice

Helpjuice provides a dedicated self‑service knowledge‑base platform aimed at customer support and internal help desks. It features a powerful search engine, customizable templates, and detailed analytics on article performance. The system supports multi‑language content and granular role‑based permissions.

Visit Helpjuice

Pros

Search algorithm ranks results based on relevance and popularity, improving end‑user experience. The platform includes built‑in SEO tools that help public knowledge bases rank well in search engines. Role‑based permissions allow separation of public and private content.

Cons

User interface is utilitarian and lacks the modern aesthetic of newer competitors. Content authoring relies heavily on a WYSIWYG editor with limited markdown support. The pricing model is tiered by the number of articles rather than users, which may be counter‑intuitive for some organisations.

Document360

Document360 is a cloud‑based knowledge‑base and documentation portal that targets SaaS companies and product teams. It offers a markdown editor, version control, and a built‑in portal for publishing public or private docs. The platform also includes AI‑powered suggestions for article improvement.

Visit Document360

Pros

Versioning and rollback allow teams to manage documentation changes safely. The portal can be white‑labeled, giving a consistent brand experience for external users. Integration with GitHub, Zapier, and Intercom streamlines content workflows.

Cons

The learning curve for the advanced editor and portal configuration can be steep. Export functionality is limited to PDF and HTML, making bulk migration difficult. The per‑project pricing model may increase costs for organisations with multiple product lines.

Feature Comparison

Product	Pricing (Free / Paid)	Customisation	Collaboration	Search	Integrations	Export Options
Notion	Free / $8‑$20 per user	High (page layouts, databases)	Real‑time editing	Basic	100+ (Zapier, Slack)	PDF, HTML
Confluence	Free (10 users) / $5‑$10 per user	Moderate (macros, add‑ons)	Team editing, comments	Advanced (CQL)	Jira, Trello, Bitbucket	PDF, XML
Slab	Free / $8‑$12 per user	Low (markdown only)	Inline comments	AI‑enhanced	Slack, GitHub, Google Workspace	Markdown, PDF
Guru	Free trial / $5‑$10 per user	Low (card‑based)	Browser/extension sync	Contextual	Salesforce, Zendesk	CSV
Helpjuice	No free tier / $120‑$350 per month	Moderate (templates)	Team notes, feedback	Relevance‑based	Zapier, Intercom	PDF, HTML
Document360	Free trial / $49‑$199 per month	High (white‑label)	Collaborative editing	AI‑assisted	GitHub, Zapier, Intercom	PDF, HTML

Conclusion

For individuals or small teams that need a flexible, low‑cost solution, Notion provides the most versatile editor and generous free tier, making it suitable for personal knowledge bases and lightweight corporate wikis. When an organisation requires strict permission control, deep integration with development tools, and audit capabilities, Confluence remains the most appropriate choice despite its higher price point. Teams focused on delivering contextual information to frontline staff should consider Guru, while companies that prioritize searchable, public‑facing documentation may find Helpjuice or Document360 better aligned with their needs. Selecting a platform should therefore be guided by the required level of customization, collaboration features, and budget constraints.